While others are saying the grass is green, you keep saying that the sky is blue. The point is that, whether through personal choice or due to their employer's choice, many people use other AV. No one is arguing with you about whether ESET is flagging SI. This is not my area of expertise, though.Īs an aside, I don't know you or your background, but I'll offer a little constructive feedback - take it for what you will.īringing up (multiple times) things like whether or not the world is flat is going to result in most people not taking your point seriously.Īlso, you're missing the point that others are trying to make. My take away was that Process Explorer doesn't get flagged because it is WHQL certified. Uh, I read through the entire thread from your link and there are only two random people (you and one other person) pleading to get ESET to stop flagging SI, while completely discounting (or outright ignoring) the evidence and arguments presented by others. To my opinion, this absense of response from these teams illustrates the level of professionalism, quality and reliability of their antiviruses. This is where everything has stopped with McAfee, even though I wrote them about the delivery problem and suggested to download the files from github by direct links (they did not reply anything to that).įinally, such antiviruses as Elastic, Zillya, Alibaba, Antiy, Cylance, MaxSecure, Palo Alto, Panda Security, Tencent and TrendMicro have not replied by e-mail at all, even though I mentioned that Microsoft Defender, ESET, VBA32, Fortinet, Sophos, Avira, Symantec and Ikarus had already confirmed the false positives. Finally they suggested me to send the files under the question as the reply to their e-mail (even though these files are publically available from github), but these files could not be delivered because of e-mail security policies. I had also contacted McAfee, and there were a lot of e-mail iterations where they asked me for more and more details (including my full name, address, phone number and so on). Probably the same could be done for System Informer by its authors (developers). I had successfully contacted Microsoft Defender, ESET, VBA32, Fortinet, Sophos, Avira, Symantec and Ikarus by e-mail regarding false positives in QSearch.dll mentioned above (to be precise, for Microsoft Defender and for some other antivirus I'd reported the false positive by using the corresponding web page provided by the antivirus maintainers). Presumably part of the MS monopoly attempt, plus incompetence. I suppose new potential users cannot succeed. Incidentally, has score zero, no problems.Įventually achieved re-install by running installer found inside program-files folder, which bypassed downloads. Gone.ĭefender "exception" settings are not honoured, even after reboot.ĭefender ignores me and is certain it knows better. Still it deletes it, "Trojan" will damage your machine. Suspended "Smart" screen & Defender, tried again. Registered systeminformer as a Defender exception (in several ways), and changed properties to accept external app, Say 'keep', two places. Proposed implementation details (optional)Īll manner of problems trying to reinstall.Įach attempt to download installer met with "Smart" screen detected a problem, calls it a trojan, blocked, deleted. ![]() Here you can find an example of idiotic antiviruses with false positives for "peview.exe". What mechanisms do we have to fight this situation? Moreover, as SystemInformer's binaries are signed, why this situation happens at all? But shouldn't this be investigated and fixed by antivirus developers instead of creating problems and damaging the reputation of software products affected by false positives? Looks like antiviruses do not like pure C code in general. dll file built by different versions of Visual Studio): Description of the feature, modification, idea or suggestionįor each version of SystemInformer, even though they are signed, I regularly get antivirus false positives for the following files:Īctually, I have the very same situation with my own open-source project written in pure C (false positives from several antiviruses for the.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |